In February of 2014, Crimea was the legitimate territory of Ukraine. And Russia invaded and occupied it. It also sent troops into eastern Ukraine to stoke an insurgency.
You're free to explain why you feel Russia was justified in going to war against Ukraine, but let's be clear that this is what you're doing.
Ok, so you are talking about Crimea, which I'm guessing we have different opinions about, right?
What is your view on this?
Go back through this thread. You'll see that I've consistently referred to Russia's actions of 2022 as an escalation of the war it began in 2014.
WHAT???? You are so Russophobic that I tend to glaze over your habit of blaming the Russians for everything. You are saying the Russians began the war in 2014? How?
By invading and occupying Ukrainian territory. Most people have no problem recognizing that as war.
The fact that many now turn to Facebook and other social media for their news is part of the problem. The erosion of the Fourth Estate proves its importance in keeping a democracy running.
I'll rephrase and try again. If the problem on May 23, 2024 is a deluded electorate, how and why was the electorate apparently non-deluded in 2020-21, and what was the inflection point?
Racking my brain for inflection points in 2020. All I can come up with are a pandemic and the murder of a Black man by a white Minneapolis police officer.
Queen size sheets can come in different sizes. Some queen size mattresses are extra long (California) size and require California-size sheets. Others may be designed for a thinner or thicker mattress. What did it say on the queen size sheet set you bought regarding measurements of the flat sheet in the set? Did you look to see if other sets were longer or wider (depending on where you need the extra fabric)?
Hi, Joan,
I've bought queen sets from a few vendors (Amazon, BB&B, Company Store, Macys) and the flat sheets from every one of them are too narrow to tuck under the mattress. I don't think one can shop for a larger queen-size flat sheet, if that's what you're suggesting.
I have bought relatively inexpensive and relatively expensive queen sized sheets and this is the case for newer queen mattresses--they aren't long enough to tuck in the sides. You can buy separates which might solve your problem, but king is so wide compared to the queen, the sheet will be practically dragging on the floor before you tuck it in.
I like the deep overhang. I like to tuck all that extra sheet in and get the cocoon effect.
- If any former SSR shows signs of U.S. meddling, this represents and existential threat to Russia, and there are no limits on how Russia can respond. Anything -- invasion, occupation, annexation, threatening nuclear strikes -- is justified in response to an existential threat.
- Any former SSR that acts against Russian interests is acting on behalf of the U.S. No post-Soviet state would ever, of its own volition, act against Russian interests. Any state that does so,and any political leader in such a state that does so, is an agent of or being manipulated by the United States.
- No act by a former SSR to provide for its own defense against current or future Russian aggression is justified, because if Russia is threatening it this means Russia is responding to U.S. meddling. In fact, the very act of taking defensive measures is itself proof of ill intent against Russia, directed by the United States.
Popular Comments
PVW
In February of 2014, Crimea was the legitimate territory of Ukraine. And Russia invaded and occupied it. It also sent troops into eastern Ukraine to stoke an insurgency.
You're free to explain why you feel Russia was justified in going to war against Ukraine, but let's be clear that this is what you're doing.
Like 4 LikesPVW
Russia invaded Ukraine on February 27, 2014.
Like 4 LikesPVW
By invading and occupying Ukrainian territory. Most people have no problem recognizing that as war.
Like 4 Likesdave
The fact that many now turn to Facebook and other social media for their news is part of the problem. The erosion of the Fourth Estate proves its importance in keeping a democracy running.
Like 4 Likesmrincredible
I’ll buy that for a dollar!
Like 3 LikesDaveSchmidt
Racking my brain for inflection points in 2020. All I can come up with are a pandemic and the murder of a Black man by a white Minneapolis police officer.
Like 3 Likesmax_weisenfeld
Less humid now and tomorrow and a nice breeze
Like 3 LikesThe_Soulful_Mr_T
I like the deep overhang. I like to tuck all that extra sheet in and get the cocoon effect.
Like 3 Likesmarksierra
Came upon these just recently:
Songs of disappearance - Australian Bird Calls.
In this ARIA chart-topping recording of pure birdsong you can hear 53 of our most threatened species:
(ARIA is the Australian Recording Industry Association. Aussie version of the Grammy Awards.)
https://youtu.be/c2M0H9Z1HuQ
Aussie Birds and their calls
https://youtu.be/vhlE13EqjJk
Australia's most common birds
https://youtu.be/T5UEwzp2bWs
Like 3 LikesPVW
Let me see if I can sum up the Nan doctrine:
- If any former SSR shows signs of U.S. meddling, this represents and existential threat to Russia, and there are no limits on how Russia can respond. Anything -- invasion, occupation, annexation, threatening nuclear strikes -- is justified in response to an existential threat.
- Any former SSR that acts against Russian interests is acting on behalf of the U.S. No post-Soviet state would ever, of its own volition, act against Russian interests. Any state that does so,and any political leader in such a state that does so, is an agent of or being manipulated by the United States.
- No act by a former SSR to provide for its own defense against current or future Russian aggression is justified, because if Russia is threatening it this means Russia is responding to U.S. meddling. In fact, the very act of taking defensive measures is itself proof of ill intent against Russia, directed by the United States.
Like 2 Likes